[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Joseph Cardoso with JPMorgan.

Maybe for my first, if I could. George, you called out accelerating purchase decision and pricing benefits as well as structural improvement and underlying demand at the same time. Can you maybe just walk us through the key drivers that is helping to distinguish between those dynamics? And what drives your confidence around maybe the more durable demand part of that? And just particularly in the context of the outlook, which implies at the time heading into the second half of fiscal year? And then I have a follow-up.

Thank you for the question. We had an exceptional start to the year. The demand profile was broad-based and we saw strength across every customer type, by size, medium, small public sector. We saw it across all the geographies, and we saw it across industry verticals, workload solutions, on-prem, Keystone, cloud. So super strong broad-based portfolio strength. I think when we distinguish the 3 buckets, clearly, what we saw in the quarter was counter to what we see typically when prices of silicon and commodity costs go up dramatically, customers generally lean into tech refresh. We saw into maintenance and non-refresh. We saw the opposite. We saw much higher than the anticipated strength across all classes of customers. Within the largest customers, we saw some pockets of accelerated purchasing. But in many of those customers, we also saw them for less priority workloads and use cases be more moderated in their buying behavior as is typical. And then we saw clearly as commodity prices have gone up, we have adjusted our pricing, and you could see that in the outperformance in our product gross margin relative to our guidance, which is reflected in our ability to capture higher pricing.

No. Got it. George, I appreciate the color there. And maybe just a quick follow-up on the last comments you made. I just wanted to get an update or a clarification on how you're thinking about. I think you believe -- I believe you guys called out product gross margins troughing in the first quarter itself. Is that playing out? And then maybe more specifically, are you realizing the full benefits of the flow-through of the pricing actions you've taken and whether that's already playing now in 2Q? Or should we expect that to still be a tailwind going out into the 3Q or one of the subsequent quarters?

Yes, great question. And so in Q1, we did outperform our expectations with respect to the product gross margin, as George mentioned. We did have a bit of a favorable product mix associated with the various customer types and the geos that we serve. And so it did help us a little bit. As we think and we look forward to Q2 and the rest of the year, the outlook very much on product margin has improved slightly relative to our prior guidance that we've provided 90 days ago. And so that's sort of an incremental positive, which basically says we have a bit more confidence in our ability to recoup the incremental costs that we're paying albeit probably won't be at the same levels we saw in Q1, but I would stress that it would be -- we're anticipating or -- and projecting it to be better than we thought it would be 90 days ago for the rest of the year.

Your next question comes from the line of Mehdi Hosseini with Susquehanna Financial Group.

Yes. I also have a question with 2 parts. George, help me understand how would you break up your customers' investment and splitting modernization, upgrade of existing installed base of a storage from incremental capacity added due to AI inferencing? And my second question is for Wissam. I'm a little bit confused with the product gross margin trajectory. I think expectation was for gross margin -- product gross margin to be troughing in the mid-50% and improve from there. But your Q2 guide implies that we actually may see a Q-over-Q decline. If you could clarify, it would be appreciated.

With regard to your first question, Mehdi, we have seen super strong growth in our product portfolio as well as offerings like our all-flash array, Keystone and our cloud storage. Pretty much across the board, we were well ahead of our expectations. And we continue to see that strength durable for multiple quarters, which is why 1 quarter into the year, we have raised the full year materially, including the second half, right? So really, really strong momentum in the business. With regard to what we saw, there are AI-specific build-outs, which are, for example, GPU as a service cloud, GPU environment within enterprises and data lakes and modern data lake type environment being built, particularly for GPU usage and for AI analytics. There is, however, also as other people have noted, including the hyperscalers, a broad-based modernization of a variety of adjacent workloads and infrastructures, right? So when you use AI, you also want to modernize your databases, you also want to modernize your unstructured data environment to get them ready, and we saw that happening pretty much across all the industries and all the customer segments. So really strong momentum. We're excited for the year, super confident about our position in the market and the alignment to where customers are prioritizing spending.

And to the second part of the question, Mehdi. Look, we did anticipate -- so maybe I'll explain how we anticipated the product gross margin to be shaped throughout the year, 90 days ago. We said that we would see a trough in Q1, and we anticipate a slight improvement for the rest of the year or gradual improvement for the rest of the year. Now fast forward to today, we did manage Q1 product gross margin in a really great way. I think we did a great job in execution and we outperformed our expectations for Q1. So that's sort of the first point I want to make. The second point is when we compare now Q2 to Q4 for the rest of the year to where it was 90 days ago, we're now expecting it to be slightly better. So if you think of the prior guidance had product gross margin in sort of the low 50% range if you sort of -- even though we don't guide every number, but that's what was implied in the guidance, what's implied now in the updated guidance for the rest of the year in product gross margin is slightly better than that. That's really the -- hopefully, that clarifies and answers your question.

Your next question comes from the line of Amit Daryanani with Evercore.

I guess just 2 questions from my side as well. I think one of the big things that investors are trying to figure out is just the durability of growth that you and everyone else is seeing. And if I think about your fiscal year guide, your folks are going to do 26% growth in Q1, ex extra week, you're going to 23% in Q2. And I think it's like 9% or 10% in the back half of the year. Can you just talk like what is driving that sort of deceleration? And is that exit rate in the back half of 9%, 10%, sort of the right way to think about what the long-term growth should be for the company? And then George, you sort of talked about you're seeing clear structural improvement in the underlying demand environment. Can you maybe just help us appreciate like what metrics are you looking at or tracking that give you confidence that this is a structural shift versus perhaps prebuying given all the price increases?

I think, first of all, we are 1 quarter into our fiscal year and our approach has been to provide guidance that we feel confident about. We have raised the year materially to reflect the strength of our position and have raised the second half of the year right at the start of the year, right? And so I would not say that we are being cautious about the year. We feel really strongly about the performance. I think as I noted, with regard to what gives us confidence, it is the fact that all of our product lines, all of our customer segments by size, all of the types of commercial vehicles we use multiyear agreements, storage as a service, traditional CapEx transactions as well as the performance through all of our routes to market have outperformed materially and the outlook for the year is very strong. So we feel really, really good about our position both in terms of alignment to customer spend, the overall customer discussions we're having and the expanding opportunities we see across all kinds of customers.

Your next question comes from the line of Krish Sankar with TD Cowen.

Congrats on the good results. George, my first question is that you kind of closed like 350 AI and data lake deals this quarter. Last quarter is more like 500. I understand the deal sizes are getting bigger. Is there a way you can quantify how much was the deal size and revenue dollars in the July versus April quarter? And from a bigger picture perspective, how much of your revenues is driven by AI? And then I had a quick follow-up for Wissam after that.

I think it's hard to quantify specifically what percentage of the revenue is driven by AI for 2 reasons. One is there are customer-specific AI-specific environment, right, which is what the 350 deals that we said count toward. These are typically GPU connected AI stack connected deals. That being said, as we and others have noted, AI is now driving a broad-based modernization and replatforming of the data infrastructure stack, so that you can support the needs of high-performance, inferencing use cases, the ability to build cross-application kind of data infrastructures and that is reflected across the strength of our business. So 350 were AI stack-specific use cases, but the overall performance of the business reflects the influence of AI to modernize the entire data infrastructure. And we had signaled many years ago that we had started to see that momentum acceleration. We saw that in Q4. We are off to a super start in Q1. Our outlook for the year is very positive, and we see really good momentum across our entire portfolio.

Got it. And then Wissam, a quick question. Your component costs are going up. So is your inventory levels. I'm just wondering, when you look at your products, you kind of spoke about the product gross margin, what is the equation you're solving for? Is it managing product mix or price capture to generate more gross profit dollars? And where are most of the inventory dollars spent on?

Yes. So Krish, we did exit Q1 with a slightly higher inventory, but that's because, obviously, we continue to manage our supply and secured supply to be able to secure product for the demand growth that we're seeing. What we're basically focused on is the total gross profit for the company. We managed the total gross margin, but also the total gross profit dollars. And as you can see, as the top line grows, we're seeing gross profit dollars growing almost at a similar pace. That's because this is what drives really the earnings power of the business. The -- I think this is best demonstrated when you also sort of take it down to the operating margin line. And you can see how basically any time where we upsided gross profit and gross margin, we tend to generate quite a bit of operating margin leverage. So I don't know if this answers your question.

I think one of the things we have also -- one of the things we've also worked on to provide customers with the right solution for their use cases, I think we have started to see again the resurgence of hybrid flash in our portfolio and we anticipate a much stronger contribution from hybrid flash. So we're, as Wissam said, we're trying to solve as many customer problems with the right mix of portfolio and manage the overall business for gross profit dollar growth.

Your next question comes from the line of Asiya Merchant with Citigroup.

It's Mike Cadiz for Asiya Merchant at Citi. So my first question is regarding pricing. So as pricing actions begin to flow through and materialize in the quarter -- in quarters, how much of the expected pricing benefit do you think has been realized? And are you seeing any change in demand elasticity albeit early on?

I think with -- I'll take the demand question and Wissam can address the pricing capture. I think with regard to demand, listen, we have always believed and continue to believe that customers budget in dollars. What we are seeing reflected in the market is that the overall budget priority for data infrastructure and storage has gone up significantly in our customers. Within customers, for example, there are use cases where even at a higher price, they will be prioritizing spending on that. But within the same customer, they may defer till a future quarter a less priority use case. And we have seen that in our customer base. In some of those customers, they have also decided to go from a flash-based solution to a hybrid flash-based solution for the lower value use case, right? And so I would say that the most important thing that we have seen is unlike in prior cycles with the significant increase in pricing, we are actually seeing broad-based infrastructure spending, and we believe that it is correlated with AI and the modernization requirements of AI.

Yes. And with respect to the delay between the pricing actions and when we start seeing it. Look, we've taken actions to be more agile in this environment. So the impact of price increases should materialize sooner than in the past. In the past, for instance, it would take probably 2 to 3 quarters to start seeing it. But now we're seeing it much earlier.

Your next question comes from the line of Erik Woodring with Morgan Stanley.

George, I just want to maybe press it as a follow-up to Amit's question earlier, which is I realize we're just 1 quarter into the year, it's early, but your second half revenue is usually up like high single digits versus your first half. And you're guiding it down. And so I understand the desire to remain conservative and provide a guide that you can hit. But given your qualitative commentary about demand, like why couldn't you beat those expectations by 10%, 20%? I just want to make sure we're not missing anything, just as we think about seasonality from the first half to the second half and anything that could be maybe an offset the way that -- the way that we're thinking about normal seasonality? And then a quick follow-up, please.

Yes. So Erik, this is Wissam. When we think of the seasonality, if you adjust for the extra week in Q1, we are now roughly seeing -- looking at 50-50, maybe a little bit -- when we're talking rounding here, a little bit more than 50% in the second half, a little bit less than 50% in the first half. I mean you can do the math. But that's just basically based on our visibility at this time. We do, however, see as George mentioned in his prepared remarks, a really strong structural improvements in the demand. It's broad-based. It's driven by AI workloads. It's driven by modernization, and we basically are looking at that being the driver of revenue for the rest of the year.

We have 1 quarter in, Erik. We feel really good on our business. We've raised Q2 guidance. We've raised the full year guide. We'll tell you more as we play through the year. We are super confident about our position in the market, and we'll tell you more as we play through the year.

Awesome. Thank you, George. I can hear it in your voice. So I appreciate that, guys. And then Wissam, just one clarification point. The comments that you make about product gross margins and your ability to maybe get a little bit better capture here in the first quarter, is that purely a function of pricing and pricing confidence and kind of confidence in the demand inelasticity response there? I just want to make sure that we think about your ability to maybe capture slightly better product gross margins, it's because it's a function of price and not necessarily the other side, obviously being the BOM inflation.

Yes. Look, I mean, my comment is based on everything we see. As we look at -- as we form our outlook and we look and we project the business, we put everything that we know in our numbers. And that's really what my comment is about. It has to do with pricing. It has to do with mix. It has to do with multiple factors that basically go -- and of course, the cost side of the equation, that basically goes into forming the final, basically product margin.

Your next question comes from the line of Param Singh with Oppenheimer Inc.

So you've done a couple of acquisitions -- niche acquisitions recently. And I wanted to understand where do you see gaps in your technology portfolio today? And where does this make sense to buy versus build? And then I had a follow-up.

I think we are disciplined in our approach to acquisitions. The 2 that we have talked about are tied to cloud and AI. And they provide us with differentiated offerings to accelerate our position in each of those use cases. With regard to DataPelago it is really about AI-driven analytics and the inferencing where we can accelerate the application processing adjacent to storage providing customers a better inferencing solution top to bottom. With regard to JetStream, which we acquired at the start of Q2, it really strengthens our already strong position in VMware migrations to the cloud. We have really good solutions for customers that want to use NetApp to migrate. But for customers that are non-NetApp on-prem, we have a really good starting point with a DR in the cloud solution. So those are the 2 areas, AI and cloud that we're focused on, and we feel good about the technology portfolio that we have and we are doing tuck-ins to enhance the overall solution value to customers.

Understood, George. And then as my follow-up, your guidance implies that OpEx would go up as a percentage of revenue from the Q2 level in the back half. So I want to understand why there is an increase in investment in the back half? And then where would that actually go, whether it's R&D or sales and marketing? So if you could give some color on the investments that you're thinking about for the rest of the year, that would be great.

Yes, Param, this is Wissam. So the increase is driven really by a couple of areas. One, as we outperform, we're getting -- we have a slightly higher variable compensation accruals. And then the second is really continuing to invest in our AI solutions. But when you look at the overall OpEx for the year and you sort of look what is implied in the guidance, year-over-year is still a -- year-over-year increase for the full year, it still shows basically that the increase is less -- much less than the half of the revenue -- projected revenue growth. So we continue to be very disciplined in how we invest and how we look at our OpEx. That's, of course, because operating leverage and driving operating margin is a key element of our business model.

Your next question comes from the line of Wamsi Mohan with BofA.

I have a couple of clarifying questions. I think as you sort of think about the full year, a, would you say that your expectation of hybrid versus all-flash is similar versus your prior expectations? Would you say that given what you're seeing with supply that the upside that you're guiding to would be more driven by one versus other? And I have a quick follow-up, too.

Listen, I think that if you look at the overall business, all-flash performed exceptionally strongly in Q1, right? It was up 47% year-on-year. So when we look at the overall year, all-flash still blows out our prior expectations. Hybrid flash, when we had planned the year, we were cautious about customers' spending on non-mission-critical workloads. That is typically what they do, right? When you see price increases, customers pull back on capital equipment spending, we are seeing broad-based acceleration in capital spending across the board. And we are -- which is a sign of the AI super cycle. But then we are also seeing customers buying more hybrid flash. I would say if you look at the relative comparison. Listen, all-flash is super strong and will still be the predominant part of the acceleration in our business.

Okay. And as my follow-up, just is there any way you could give us some sense of this magnitude of these accelerated purchases. Going back to Erik's question on half over half seasonality, you guys obviously sound very confident on the outlook over here. But could you just help us through -- think through mathematically, how large was the accelerated purchases or the contribution there, which we should factor in as pull forward? Or is that just acceleration of demand that is coming not necessarily from the second half?

I think first of all, we're not going to break it out, right? Wamsi, I think what I would tell you is the number of customers and the percentage of our customer base that have the financial flexibility to do accelerated spending is very small, right? These are very large private companies usually. Not even public sector organizations have the flexibility to do accelerated purchasing. So it is a much smaller percentage of customers than you would imagine, right? Very small percentage. What we saw in the results in Q1 was certain transactions that we expected to be built out over multiple quarters happening within a quarter. That doesn't mean that those same customers didn't defer other projects to accommodate these projects, right? And so I would tell you that it's a percentage of our business, we did not see it in Q4, but we saw it in Q1, and we felt like it was appropriate for us to acknowledge it. But it is not a material part of the overall business. In certain clients, as we talk about they are kitting out multiple data centers. They wanted to kit out. They said, let's do 2 of the 4 that we want to do faster this calendar year and we'll come back for the other 2. We had expected kind of a more gradual build-out of those. That is not common and widespread across the customer base.

Your next question comes from the line of Steven Fox with Fox Advisors.

I was curious if you could talk a little bit more about new customer wins. You mentioned that, that was also contributed to growth this quarter. I was curious from the standpoint of what maybe you're leading with and whether it's what kind of products, et cetera, and whether you're having success in certain verticals that we should be aware of?

Thank you for your question. We saw strength, as we said in our prepared remarks, in new customer acquisition, in new workload expansion within existing customers and stronger-than-expected tech refresh in our business. With new customers, we typically attack from 2 different vectors. One is our kind of cloud-based solutions or our purpose-built block optimized solutions for the corporate and mid-market customers and with our unified sort of simplify your infrastructure, unify it on one platform solution for the enterprise. And we feel really good about our position with both new customer counts, new customer dollars as well as expansion within existing customers were all as well ahead of our internal forecast.

Your next question comes from the line of Katherine Murphy with Goldman Sachs.

In line with the following question regarding new customer acquisition through new workloads and new product categories, can you talk more about the success you're seeing in the AFX platform? I know you highlighted a public sector win in the quarter, but anything to share just on the momentum there and how that may be contributing to outlook for the full year?

AFX is built for the very high end of the performance and scale environment. So the number of transactions are not as many but the size of the transactions are material. We have really focused it on the AI GPU as a service category, and we're seeing good progress. We talked about neoclouds. We talked about the government agency that's building a private AI cloud. And so good progress. It is being certified across a large number of customers, and we're excited to continue to make progress on the solution.

Your next question comes from the line of Tim Long with Barclays.

Yes, maybe a follow-on, and then the second one. On the public cloud business, 19% growth ex the extra week is still very good growth rate. We've seen it kind of around that number for the last 1.5 years or so. So just curious, is there anything in the pipeline or new solutions or customer bases or anything that could maybe accelerate that number? And then second, on Keystone, I did want to touch on that, you talked about growth and strength there. Looking at the professional services line and backing out an extra week, it doesn't look like it grew that much and we're kind of seeing or hearing about more as-a-service purchases in that area instead of paying up for more expensive hardware-based solutions because of the NAND price increases. So just talk about what you're seeing with those as-a-service solutions. I'm surprised we're not seeing a little bit more acceleration in that.

I think with regard to the public cloud business, listen, it stayed in the high teens as we have scaled the business. So I'm encouraged by the sustained momentum of the business. Obviously, the cloud storage business performed at a much higher level than that. And so we continue to see strength in the 1P or the first-party and marketplace storage services. With regard to the things that we're bringing out, please come to INSIGHT. We have more AI solutions with the hyperscalers. We have more use cases combining data on-prem with hyperscale cloud and we have brought block storage and lower cost price points in multiple clouds, including Google and Amazon. So really good progress across the portfolio in cloud. With regard to Keystone, without giving you a specific number, I will just say our Keystone business grew roughly in the same ballpark as prior quarters and in the same ballpark as our overall flash business, which is a really strong number. So we're excited about the progress of the business. We are seeing more new customers that we are targeting with Keystone, and we are bringing more capabilities to that part of our portfolio.

And Tim, just to add to what George said on Keystone, keep in mind, Keystone didn't really benefit much from the extra week, it benefited a very, very minimal amount.

Your next question comes from the line of Victor Chiu with Raymond James.

So inventory nearly doubled sequentially. Just kind of wondering, is that a function of trying to secure NAND and other components against expected demand? And maybe how much you have the inventory increases earmarked to specific customer orders and backlog. And a follow-up there is, does the inventory buildup kind of give you better visibility into the remaining year and into next year?

Yes. I didn't get the second part of the question. But on the first part of the question, most of the inventory build out in that way, some strategic purchases and basically us managing inventory to be able to ship to our customers based on the strength of demand. So I wouldn't say -- in my mind, this is a positive. We're really making sure that we have the supply to continue to drive the growth in the business. I'm sorry, could you please repeat the second part of the question? I didn't get...

Yes. Does the inventory buildup kind of give you better supply and cost visibility, I guess, throughout this year and into next year?

Yes, it typically does.

You know, pricing is going to be less of a function in the growth, I guess.

You're correct. It typically does.

Your final question today comes from the line of David Vogt with UBS.

Great. So I'm going to keep it brief, George. You've answered a lot of questions. But just a question on demand as we think about the next couple of quarters, is there any sort of seasonality that you saw in the most recent quarter, particularly as we go into subsequent quarters from industry verticals? I know if we go into the October quarter, obviously, there are customers that have different fiscal year-end. Did you see any sort of demand maybe slightly different seasonal demand patterns in the quarter? Because I know I think Wissam mentioned that there was a little bit of a pull-in. I'm just trying to get a sense for how do we think about sort of the normal seasonality? Maybe this isn't normal, but how do we think about the seasonality of demand as we move through the back half of this year?

Listen, I think our Q2 outlook, if you adjust for the extra week in Q1 is roughly in line with typical seasonality. And as Wissam mentioned, second half and first half are within spitting distance of our typical seasonality, right? I think we have a really broad book of business, David. And so the movement of any one customer is not going to affect the broad book of business. I think the one exception to that is typical U.S. public sector seasonality, right? And that you are quite aware of. So we feel really good about the momentum in the business. Listen, as we said, exceptional start to the year, we had strength across pretty much every part of our portfolio across every customer type, on-prem and cloud, every geography, we've raised the full year guide. We've raised Q2 guide. We feel really good about the momentum in the business, and we'll tell you more as we get through the year. So super excited.

Thank you, David. I'll pass it over to George for closing comments.

Thanks, Kris. With broad-based momentum, we delivered an exceptional start to fiscal year '27, exceeding our guidance on every metric, strengthening our conviction in the durability of demand and underpinning our confidence in our materially higher expectations for the year. The NetApp platform addresses a wide range of customer requirements, helping to operationalize AI workflow and accelerating cloud journey, driving new customer wins and deepening existing relationships. Our ongoing innovation continues to strengthen the value of the NetApp platform and at our upcoming INSIGHT conference we'll showcase new solutions that unlock value for AI and in high-growth markets. We're building a durable foundation for long-term success, delivering sustained value for our customers and shareholders.

This concludes today's call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect.